The Critical 'I'
 
   
 
 
PLEASE NOTE!
This blog has moved. Visit Population Statistic for the latest, and update your bookmarks.

This site will be disabled by the end of 2004 whenever I get around to attempting the import into WordPress ;). Certain components of the site, like commenting and trackback, will be disabled here before then.
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
Search
The Critical 'I'

 
 
   
 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.


This page is powered by Blogger, the easy way to update your web site.

Like butta



rss search!

Weblog Commenting by HaloScan.com

Blogster.Net -
Blog-ilicious!


 
 
 
Other Blogs
 
 

Tuesday, June 01, 2004


 
ONLINE NEWS ENHANCES, INSTEAD OF DISPLACES
The assumption is that, as people consume more of their news information through the Web, they intake less of it through other, more traditional sources. But the latest Harris Poll shows that, in fact, online news access doesn't cut into other media usage at all.

How does this break down? Different rates of consumption, depending on what's happening:
Leo Bogart, a media research expert, said "Many of those who go online believe that this has cut into the time they spend with newspapers and TV news, but the typical Internet user checks the news only once a day for a total of an hour a week. When a big story is breaking and people are eager to learn the latest developments, they'll get the bulletins fast on the Internet. That may make them all the more interested in the full details they can check out elsewhere."
The "information overload" that many people complain about seems not to be as overwhelming as they fear. As a media junkie, I'm pleased.

----------


 
ROTTEN RATINGS: ENGENDERED BY THE REGULAR SEASON?
power failure flame out
Not surprisingly, these 2004 Stanley Cup Finals games are sucking canal water, ratings-wise. A real shame, as the Lightning-Flames matchup is shaping up to be one of the all-time best.

What can be done? Well, short of my brilliant proposal to plug in New York and Los Angeles teams into every pro sport championship game, regardless of who makes it through the playoffs, the NHL is going to have to continue to try to build a large enough fanbase that will help draw in plenty of casual fans come playoff time. Decoupling television fortunes from ABC, at least partially, will actually help, as I'm of the opinion that Disney/ABC is showing a pattern of mishandling all its televised sports properties. In the case of the NHL, when you're at the bottom, you can only go up.

But here's something to consider: An acknowledged reason for the ratings shortfall is the presence of two smaller-market teams in the Finals; and worse, one of them being Canadian (presumably, if this had been Toronto-Calgary, not a single American soul would be watching). This in itself wouldn't be an issue if hockey overall were more of an event sports; by contrast, the Super Bowl gets huge ratings no matter which podunk towns the two teams represent. But things being as they are, the NHL championship relies on viewership numbers from individual teams' devotees, typically large markets (New York, Chicago, Philly) and/or traditional powerhouse teams that have something of a cross-country following (Detroit, Colorado, St. Louis). This is a double-edged sword, in that once those teams drop out of the postseason, most of their fans tend to drop out as well; it's all very provincial, and doesn't encourage following the league beyond the hometown team or, at best, the division.

So why, then, is the NHL looking to exacerbate this effect by adopting a regular-season schedule that puts even more emphasis on divisional matchups? The way I see it, the new 72-game schedule, with a near-neverending slate of games within divisions and no interconference play, just about ensures that fans will pay less attention to extra-divisional teams come playoff time. Instead of following the NHL, a fan in Boston will follow the Bruins and the NHL Northeast, and once the teams from that division get knocked out of the playoffs, s/he'll stop watching, because the familiarity is gone. It's like the league is eating itself, region by region. Not exactly a recipe for growing the game.

Oh well. Go Bolts.

----------


 
CUTTING MISS AMERICA
You may recall the flop that was the 2003 Miss America Pageant. In an effort to halt the slide to irrelevance, and make for better television ratings, the spectacle of beauty will be trimmed down this year from three hours to two.
"In the reformatting of the show, they wanted and we wanted a faster-paced, hipper TV show, in keeping with today’s demands," [interim Miss America Organization CEO Art] McMaster said. "The three-hour show, honestly, dragged a little bit. We feel we can put on a better show in two hours."
This decision came directly from the network. If ABC is committed to running this fossil amid declining ratings, they're going to minimize the hole it'll swallow. I'll bet ABC was pushing for even less airtime, like 90 minutes or even an hour.

I'm reminded of some words of wisdom some financial analyst uttered back in the mid-'90s, when the business world was caught up in cutting back on employee numbers; it might've been Ken Favaro, I don't rightly remember:
"No company ever downsized its way to greatness".
I'm thinking this applies to the Miss America Pageant as well. This move is about survival, not reaching new heights.

----------


 
THE STATE OF SUICIDE
killing fields
Growing up in New York, you learned early about the wealth of comedic fodder to be found across the state line in New Jersey. The mere idea of the Garbage Garden State was enough to elicit a good chuckle.

If only we had material like this back when I was an young lad: A state government-commissioned study, "Suicide in New Jersey, 1999-2000", finds that more New Jerseyans die from suicide than homicide each year.

Punch line: Living in Joisey makes you want to kill yourself before someone else can beat you to it.

Of course, you've gotta wonder how many of the documented suicides were really just cleverly-disguised whackings.

And no, I've never, personally, lived in New Jersey.

----------


Monday, May 31, 2004


 
THE GREATEST GENERATION: THE NEW MAN, REALIZED?
The unveiling of the new World War II Memorial coincided with this year's Memorial Day. Considering the diminishing ranks of the "GI Generation", to which the Memorial is dedicated, a poignant look back at the era into which they were born, from 1901 to 1924, highlights the unique and unprecedented circumstances which helped this generation achieve as much as it did.
The parents of the GI Generation had it rough. They were the "Lost Generation" of F. Scott Fitzgerald and Sinclair Lewis - generally, people born from 1883 to 1900. Few in that generation went beyond the eighth grade, and it showed.

"As a group they demonstrated no measurable improvement in educational performance over preceding generations," said William Strauss, co-author of Generations.

They were adults in the Roaring '20s, a time of prosperity but also of urban blight, sweat shops and massive immigration. They came home from World War I not to heroes' welcomes but to crackdowns on drinking and crime.

"There were issues of child health and safety," Strauss said. "The Lost Generation was not raising its children well."
It's noteworthy that a society had to hit bottom before its next generation could move up. It's debatable whether or not the Lost Generation was the bottom of the barrel in the American polity, and circumstances like World War I and the interwar years provided equal parts opportunity and disappointment.
All that would change for their kids, the GI Generation.

There were improvements in nutrition laws and vaccines. Vitamins became widely available. From 1900 to 1924 infant mortality fell by 50 percent.

The Volstead Act of 1920, which created Prohibition, failed as a social experiment but had an important benefit for the GI Generation.

"It reduced alcohol consumption in the home. The parents of the GI Generation spent less time drunk, on the whole," said Strauss.

Education improved dramatically. The GI Generation produced the "largest one-generational jump in education achievement ever," he said. "It was a generation of joiners, of team players."
Basically, a lot of medical/technological progress, combined with social experimentation, helped this generation come out in dramatically better shape than their parents.

I find the next phase of development most intriguing:
The GI Generation grew up in youth clubs, Boy Scouts, Girl Scouts, 4-H and a host of similar organizations, helping build a strong sense of community.

"They wore uniforms from the time they were young - they were the most uniformed generation in American history," Howe said.

Home from war, they went to school on the GI Bill. As adults they built well-scrubbed suburbs and won flocks of Nobel Prizes. They took mankind into space.

In return they fully enjoyed the American Dream. Social Security and Medicare were constructed with the GI Generation in mind.

"There has been no generation in history with better access to affordable housing," Strauss said, "especially considering what today's young people have to deal with.

"The Lost Generation was poor; the GI Generation was not."

The core values that made the GI Generation good citizens were formed during the first 20 or so years of their lives, said Underwood, the TGI consultant.

"They had their early childhood during the Roaring '20s, generally a time of prosperity," he said. "But they were hit hard by the molding effects of the Depression and the war."

From the Depression, he said, the youthful GI Generation learned humility, "a rejection of wealth as a status symbol."

"This broke down the mystique of wealth, even for those who would later have it," he said.

From the war came a respect for teamwork, an understanding that "we're all in this together," he said.
It struck me while reading this that, in a lot of ways, the formative experiences and immediate (post-WWII) legacy for the Greatest Generation very much resembled the goals put forth by the facist/totalitarianist movements that were taking root during the very same period in Germany, Italy and the Soviet Union. The objective of the systems advanced by Hitler, Stalin and Mussolini was the creation of the "New Man"--better, smarter, and divorced from the past. It seems that this New Man was, at the very same time, being formed in United States.

This is not to say that the Greatest Generation was a product of a fascist organization. Rather, I think they're a good example of the hollowness of fascist/totalitarianist movements, in that their stated goals were achieved in a polity that was their direct opposite--a democratic society. For sure, the level of structure in the America of the 1920s and '30s had a certain hint of authoritarianism to it, especially as compared to today's much looser civic life. But it was still developed within a liberal democratic tradition--perhaps the purest example of such during the early 20th Century. The "New Man", apparently, didn't need a strong-arm state to grow and prosper.

This article touches on a lot of ground that's been covered before, particularly in Tom Brokaw's "The Greatest Generation". But I found the presentation here to be particularly succinct and thought-provoking.

----------


 
FLORIDA ABLAZE!
Quite the way for my state to ring in this Memorial Day: Four major fires were burning in different parts of Florida today, including one closeby at the Port of Tampa. The others are more remote, as far as this St. Petersburg boy is concerned: One in Lee County, near Florida Gulf Coast University, another on the east coast in St. Lucie County, and the final one up in the boondocks of Baker County, near Georgia (and the Okefenokee Swamp--be careful, Pogo!).

This isn't California, but Florida gets its share of wildfires every season. I haven't experienced any directly; I live in the most densely populated county in the state, and while that doesn't mean it can't happen here, there's less open space and time for something like that to get out of control. I know that every so often, areas between here and Orlando get lit up, and the far-spanning highway system tends to get gummed up all the way back to Tampa, but that's about the closest I ever get to being affected by it.

Besides, when it comes to natural disasters, hurricanes and tropical storms are more Florida's bag.

----------


Sunday, May 30, 2004


 
PRIVILEGED, NOT POWERFUL
The law firm of Morgan, Colling & Gilbert is a familiar institution in the Central Florida/Tampa Bay area, thanks to a massive amount of advertising over the years. It's worked bigtime: The firm is one of the biggest in the state now. Much of that growth has been thanks to the aggressive strategy of the firm's President, John Morgan, who was the subject of a great profile by Cynthia Barnett in Florida Trend recently (free registration required).

As astute as Morgan is at marketing for the legal industry, I have to question his latest slogan:
We represent the people, not the powerful.
On the surface, it conveys what it's supposed to: Morgan goes to bat for the little guy, and spurns the fat cats who usually have all the advantages in the courtroom. It's an effective sound bite.

However, I think the implication this slogan creates is iffy. By saying he doesn't represent the powerful, he's saying that the people have no power. This is, of course, contrary to the founding principle of a democratic society: That political power and legitimacy stems from the people. To suggest that "the people" and "the powerful" are mutually exclusive is, to me, somewhat cynical.

I'm not saying that Morgan, Collings & Gilbert's advertising has to pass the muster of political theory. But the wording here strikes me as having a definitely negative undercurrent, which I think is the last thing the firm wants to get across.

So here's my suggestion for a more appropriate slogan:
We represent the people, not the privileged.
Replace "powerful" with "privileged". It gets across the same sentiment, without the cynicism. It's a distinction I think is worth making.

So, if you're reading this, John Morgan, consider this food for thought. If you go with it, consider it a freebie.

----------


 
BLOG-ONLY, NO-CLICK-THRU NEWS DIET
Does reading blogs make you smart, or stupid? That's essentially the question to be answered in Steve Rubel's self-inflicted experiment to limit his entire news media intake this week to nothing but blogs:
I am doing this to prove to myself that the blogosphere has reached a critical juncture. My theory is that there are enough really smart, influential individuals out there who will essentially filter "all the news that's fit to blog." All I need to know about life I can learn from blogs...

My self-imposed info-hunger strike, however, does not mean that mass media is going away anytime soon. In fact, it will only become more relevant as blogs act like a media magnifying glass and perform essential "checks and balances" on news reported by the pros.
I've poo-pooed the idea of relying on blogs as your primary/only news source, mainly because most are, indeed, just another news filter. Unless they're written as primary or secondary news accounts--and relatively few are, and even then in limited venues (soldiers in Iraq, etc.)--I don't see much benefit from reading a blogger's account instead of directly to the news outlet article that's being referenced. To me, a blog might point you in the direction of a news item, and give you an opinionated twist on it, but you're not going to learn much about the story unless you actually click through to the originating article.

Which leads me to the most curious part of Rubel's exercise:
I will also not click any blog links to journalist-written stories or browse non-blog RSS feeds.
This is in keeping to limiting his consumption to blogosphere-only content, but it also raises an interesting point: How often do blog readers actually click through to the hyperlinked article that's referenced in a blog post? And should they?

Presumably, the blogger includes a hyperlink to the news item that's being riffed on for a reason. Is it to provide the reader the full story? Is it a citation, as proof that the blogger isn't just making up a story? And more importantly, in the context of the writer-reader relationship, does the blogger expect the reader to actually click through to the link(s) provided in a post, or should the reader "stay put" and just take in the blog post as the entire story and regard the links as optional perusal?

This is something I've often wondered about regarding blogs, and regarding my own blogging. Should I bother digging for links to incidental information in a post, when the odds of anyone actually clicking on those links seems to be miniscule? Do I do it more for my own reference? Is the appearance of a hyperlink in a post just a visual notation that, yes, the writer is focusing on some external source instead of pulling things out of the air, but it's not necessary to actually check what's on the other end of that hyperlink?

My own blog reading habits tend to fluctuation regarding this: Sometimes I'll click through to the hyperlinked article, sometimes I won't. It depends on my level of interest in both the subject and the blogger. I'd say that it's the blogger's job to make me want to look further into the matter that determines whether or not I should check out the links provided in the post.

And that's why I think this aspect of Rubel's "diet" is flawed. It might come down to definitions, but I think the purpose of a blog is not only to expose you to the ideas and opinions of the blogger, but also to point you to primary/secondary news items that inspired those ideas and opinions in the first place. Relying solely on the blogger's word seems unnecessarily limiting to me; if there's a hyperlink in the post, I look at it as an invitation to click through to read it. A blog's content doesn't materialize out of thin air; the story behind the blog story is provided for you, so you might as well make use of it. Rubel's approach almost contradicts the spirit of blog reading--to get both the blogger's opinion and other opinions at once.

So what will Rubel's blog-only reading yield? We'll have to see; he's started the insanity this morning. And yes, please, click on through!

(Via Poynter; yes, click through here too!)

----------


Saturday, May 29, 2004


 
SHE BLOGS OLD PEOPLE
Tia at Night in the Big City frets about joining the ranks of adulthood. Specifically the same 'hood where this guy is living:
The man with the Maybach asked me what I’d been up to.

I threw my head back and giggled. "Blogging," I said.

He smiled. "You kids and Harry Potter," he said. "How old are you anyways?"
Can't say I blame her.

----------


 
DVR USERS WATCH MORE COMMERCIALS
In a reversal of the assumptions that have had most TV programmers petrified with fear, DVR users tend to be more likely to watch television commercials, according to the research study "Demystifying Digital Video Recorders" jointly published by InsightExpress and MediaPost.
Most importantly, the research concludes that DVRs "recapture" TV commercial exposures that otherwise would have been "zapped" by non-DVR viewers. The study estimated that 51 percent of non-DVR viewers zap TV commercials, usually by using their remote control to change the channel when they come on. However, 96 percent of those viewers actually watch TV commercials when they become DVR subscribers, albeit in fast-forward mode.

While such fast-forwarding clearly diminishes the communications effectiveness of TV commercials, the study found that most fast-fowarders "notice" TV commercials either "always" (15 percent) or "sometimes" (52 percent) while zipping through the spots.
The "diminishment" cited here may not be that big a deal. The point of advertising is, foremost, to get the brand into the consumer's head. Even though the message not delivered as intended in fast-forward mode, as long as the logo/slogan/whatever makes it to the eyeballs, mission accomplished.

Moreover, notice that the favored method of commercial avoidance by non-DVR users was changing the channel. People who watch DVRed stuff effectively don't have this option--that's why they're using the DVR in the first place, to record what they want for viewing at their chosen time. So, short of turning the DVR off, the only choice they have for reducing their commerical intake is the fast-forward button, which at least keeps them on the same program. Ironically, this makes them even more of a captive audience, from an advertiser's perspective!

When you consider some of the features that are most often touted as the advantages of DVR living, this doesn't make sense. The miracle box is supposed to give the television viewer unprecedented control over what plays on the screen: The ability to pause "live" programming (actually setting the DVR to record programming in progress and make it available for viewing only a couple of minutes later, thus allowing for those pauses); time-shifting to record a program for later, more convenient viewing; and the ability to fast-forward through those commercial interruptions. Logically, having a DVR should encourage viewers to filter out everything except the scenes in the shows they record and want to watch.

Except, that it doesn't.

These findings boil down to a simple truism: Most people do not want their television viewing to be work. Think about it: Why, given the ocean of DVD purchases/rentals, videogames, pay-per-view and all the other entertainment options, do people still plop down on the couch and turn on their TVs to whatever's on at the moment? Because it's effortless. Most of the time, people don't want to go through the chore of deciding on specific entertainment content; they'd rather have it pushed at them. It's the same reason why radio still gets massive ratings, despite the presence of home stereos and car CD players. It's fundamental.

Actively sitting in front of your TV and fast-forwarding through commercials is a hassle--again, it's work. It's the last thing most people want to do; they'd rather sit back and absorb. So the commercials have to be endured for a few minutes; on balance, it's a small price to pay.

These findings confirm what I've always suspected: The primary appeal of the DVR for the majority of television viewers--and we're talking about the vast majority of media consumers, not the relatively small number who were early adopters of Tivo--is the ability to time-shift programming, and to do it in a lower-maintenance way than the VCR. That's it. The rest is gravy that may or may not be utilized.

While I always figured this was the case, I got a good taste of it at the beginning of this year, via a reader comment at Poynter.org:
Just like a VCR, when you play back a previously recorded program on a Tivo, you can fast-forward through the commercials-- carefully watching of course, for the return of the program. Even then you still see the commercials-- they just go by faster. But since you have already previously seen each commercial at least 100 time before-- you know exactly what they are promoting even at the higher speed. Or, just like a regular television set, you can hit the MUTE button during the commercial. In our household, even with our dual-tuner DirecTV/Tivo unit, 99% of our television viewing is still in "real time" complete with all the commercials. Even when my wife watches a Tivo recorded show she rarely fast-forwards through the commercials. (italics mine)
As more polling confirms these attitudes, I think the panic atmosphere in the television industry will subside, much as it did when VCRs were looked at in the same threatening light. Hopefully, this will result in a rollback of all the proposed ad-centric content like "Pepsi Smash" that's been looked upon as the workaround for DVR ad-skipping.

(Via Follow Me Here...)

----------


 
ANOTHER WAY TO COPE WITH HIGH GAS PRICES
unleaded
While inflation at the gas pump means reconsideration of holiday travel plans--and possible electoral consequences--in America, in Lebanon the reaction is a little different.

More photos of the carnage here.

Could this happen here? Not over gas, surely. But a coming spike in ice cream prices? Makes me udder shudder.

----------


Friday, May 28, 2004


 
SURFING THE WEB IN ARABIC
Since the Internet was born in the U.S., it's not surprising that morphing it into a truly World Wide Web has been a rocky road. The challenge of making it relevant to the developing world has been ongoing; now, infrastructure changes that would allow Arabic alphabet input for URLs are being planned, but hampered by differing standards in different countries.
"What Khaled [Fattal, chairman of the Multilingual Internet Names Consortium] says is true, because if you only speak Arabic, why would you be interested in the Internet?" said Paul Verhoef, a vice president at the International Corporation for Internet Names and Numbers (ICANN), which runs the .com register.

But in the case of Arabic, an alphabetic script which conveys at least four major languages and is widely used in more than 30 countries, a long-term solution could take another five years to implement, according to Charles Sha'ban, a member of the MINC board and an expert on the subject.
The root of it is that, just as multiple European (and other) languages use the Roman alphabet, languages other than Arabic use Arabic script:
Sha'ban agreed that coordination between so many players has been a problem and that commercial companies with a stake in pushing their own systems have complicated the process.

"You have 22 Arab countries, all of which would like a say. At the same time there are other countries who use the same Arabic script--Farsi, Urdu and Pashtun. So it does need more cooperation between them," he said.
I'm somewhat surprised this hasn't already come up, and been dealt with, especially in Asia. Japan and Korea are heavily into the Web, and their native alphabets are non-Roman. However, Roman script is familiar in both countries, and has been incorporated into the languages offline for years; so I guess the issue hasn't come up seriously there.

Where else? Greek, my second language, uses the Greek alphabet. But it's a small user base, and I'm sure, as with most pan-European things, they've adapted to using Roman. Cyrillic type is the norm for Russia and several other Slavic countries; again, as with the Greeks, they've probably made do with using the dominant Roman (although if this issue gets addressed, Cyrillic will probably be the first alphabets addressed).

Ultimately, it's all about accessibility: The more comfortable people are with an interface, the more likely they are to use it. That includes alphabets.

----------


 
IN MY EYES, THEY'RE BOTH BOZOS
bozonic
The clowning world was rocked recently when the International Clown Hall of Fame posthumously inducted Vance "Pinto" Colvig as the originator of the famous Bozo the Clown character, thus invalidating Larry Harmon's longstanding claim of being the true and original Bozo.

There are telltale differences between Colvig's clown, also historically referred to as "Bozo The Capitol Clown", and Harmon's "Bozo The World's Most Famous Clown":
Bozo The Capitol Clown had red mop hair and spoke with a drawl. Harmon's Bozo had bright orange-red yak hair and spoke faster and made up an entirely new vocabulary, like "wowie-kazowie." The laugh was also different.
I love it when the clowning world gets rocked. And it's getting rocked courtesy of ABCNews entertainment reporter Buck Wolf, who broke the story on this controversy.

Only one way to settle this: The Clown Way. Lemon-meringue pies at 20 paces.

FURTHER THOUGHTS: And how do I know that this is going to inspire a "Simpsons" episode? Probable title: "Will The Real Krusty Please Stand Up?" Too bad all this didn't happen six or seven years ago, when there was at least a chance that it would have been a good "Simpsons" episode; as lifeless as the series has become, I'm preemptively declaring that this spoof will suck.

----------


 
DRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGGIN'
It's amazing what a rotten night of sleep can do to you. A bad dream, or something undetermined, kept me from sound slumber last night, and I'm feeling the results today: Legs like rooted treetrunks, shoulders acutely feeling the pull of gravity, eyelids heavy... The proximity of the weekend doesn't help, either.

It's had an effect on my volunteering spirit today: Florida Blood Services has got their Bloodmobile parked out front today, and normally I'd let them hook a needle to my vein for the precious fluid. But the way I'm feeling today, it'd probably knock me out. So the blood bank goes without from this AB+ machine.

I'm amazed I got as much done this morning as I did. The rest of the afternoon is going to be rough. Maybe a little bit of goof-off blogging might help stimulate. It's either that, or head home...

----------


Thursday, May 27, 2004


 
THE "R" IS SILENT
The lovely and funny Caroline Rhea (man, she needs to get that mugshot on IMDb replaced, it's terrible!) is bringing her standup act to Tampa this weekend.

Maybe I'll go. Maybe I won't.

Something that makes it likelier that I will is this funny little nugget she dropped in her newspaper interview:
Rhea, the youngest of three girls, remains close to her family and credits the gene pool, especially her mother, for her career.

"I have just a hilarious mother, so I talk about my mother a lot," she said. "My mother doesn't say someone is homosexual. She says, 'His name is Gary and I think the r is silent.' "

----------


 
REALITY CHECK: THE FANTASIA FACTOR
So Fantasia Barrino is the new American Idol. Wasn't it exciting?

Yeah, right. Like I'd actually watch something as crappy as "American Idol". I think staring at the wall for two hours would have it beat by a country mile.

But a thought occurs to me: How much do you want to bet that legions of "Idol" worshippers will be naming their newborn baby daughters "Fantasia" now? It doesn't register on the Federal baby name database right now, but it's worth checking a year from now for an expected uptick.

Actually, despite the Disney connection, "Fantasia" sounds like the name of an exotic dancer. So I guess all those little girls who get the name now will grow up into featured acts at the Mons Venus. Actually, just go ahead and give them the middle name "Serenity", that'll cement it for sure.

----------


 
VERIZON'S "NAKED" DSL
No, it's not a high-speed Internet porn service (although like all things Web, you can certainly use it for that). In the face of customers dropping their landline phones, Verizon is trying to retain customers any way they can by allowing non-telephone subscribers to get DSL as a separate service. So it's "naked" in the sense of being available without having to buy anything else along with it (although I imagine getting it as part of a bundled telephone package would bring a discount).

This represents an acknowledgement that consumers are abandoning landline phones en masse for mobiles, and there's no turning back. So in order to stay in the game, they're offering naked DSL. Just gaining or retaining that customer is worth decoupling DSL from a telephone package.

The other factor here is the continuing battle for broadband market share between telephone companies and their cable counterparts. After years of trailing cable by 2-to-1, DSL services, sparked by aggressive pricing policies and promotion over the past year, increased their share to 42 percent of the market. Buoyed by such growth, Verizon saw an opportunity to make even further gains by offering its DSL ala carte.

I'm not too clear on how this DSL-without-phone-service deal is being offered, though. I'm guessing you'd still need a live landline telephone? Or would just a phone outlet, sans activated service, work? What about all those wireless consumers who have ditched landlines altogether? I don't see how this would entice them to go for DSL, if they'd have to activate a landline phone to get it.

----------


Wednesday, May 26, 2004


 
WI-FI CITY, MINNESOTA
First it was Cerritos, California, and now it's Chaska, Minnesota. The little town on the outskirts of Minneapolis-St. Paul has blanketed itself with enough wi-fi coverage to make itself a city-wide hotspot. A further connection with Cerritos: The same company, Tropos, is doing the installation.

Like Cerritos, this isn't a freebie: Access to the wireless high-speed network will be available to residential customers for the low-low price of $16 a month. Sounds like a great deal, and wonderful alternative to the cable and phones companies. The more this spreads, the more the price of broadband will come down.

There is some concern over the structural design of this wide-area wi-fi deployment:
Using the short-range technology for long-range networks is like "using a hammer to drive in a screw," said Derek Kerton of the Curtain Group, a Silicon Valley wireless-technology consulting firm. "You can do it, but wouldn't it be better if you found a better tool?"

Such tools include wireless technologies such as EvDO and EDGE now being used by the likes of Verizon Wireless and AT&T Wireless to offer citywide service around the country. Wi-Fi, in contrast, is designed to be a "wireless local-area network" technology, with an emphasis on the "local," Kerton argued.

While praising Tropos' ingenuity, Kerton warned that the firm's city networks could be subjected to interference from other Wi-Fi networks as well as from cordless phones, microwave ovens and other devices that use the same wireless spectrum.

Ron Pequette, a Tropos sales director who appeared with Mayer at a Tuesday press conference, said the firm has the interference problem licked.
It sounds like Kerton is pretty much shilling for the big telecom companies that potentially could be hurt by efforts like this. Not only would Verizon Wireless find it harder to push EvDO, the DSL service offered by affiliate company Verizon Corp. would also take a hit.

On the other hand, this kind of project does stetch wi-fi access points well beyond their original intended capabilities. A patchwork building of wi-fi zones might work in a tightly-packed urban community or apartment building, but over a miles-wide area... It could be that this is just a transitory solution before a more dedicated technology is ready to do the job.

----------


 
NEEDED: A TRAVEL CHARGER
charge me
Am I the only one who cannot stand those cradle-style recharge units that come with most cellphones? I got one with my new LG VX6000 phone, and I hate it. It takes me several seconds of fumbling to slide and lock the phone into the cradle so that the battery connectors are lined up for charging; you can't just drop it into place effortlessly. I think the basic problem is that the cradle is too lightweight, so it doesn't stay put when you place the phone in it. All in all, it's a pretty poor design.

I'd gotten used to not having to mess with one of these things, because my last phone came with a plug-in travel charger instead of the standard cradle. I very much prefer it--you just plug the phone in, keep the other end in an out-of-sight outlet, and you're done.

So, I'd like to have the travel charger for the VX6000. However, I'd prefer not to shell out 30 dollars for one. I've checked eBay, but I'm not comfortable with buying a cheapie knockoff that might (or might not) fry my phone.

So, I'm putting the call out: If you, or anyone you know, has a VX6000 travel charger available, let me know and I'll make an offer. I'd really like to do a straight trade, the travel charger in exchange for my cradle charger. Since the cradle retails for $10 more than the travel, I think that's a fair deal. Maybe there's someone out there who has the same phone, but doesn't like the travel charger? It's worth a shot.

I've also posted this offer on Craigslist. No bites so far.

----------


 
DONUTS IN A LOW-CARB WORLD
anatomy lesson
In the face of battering from the low-carb dieting craze, Krispy Kreme Doughnuts is going to start pushing low-sugar treats and other products to make up for the sales drop.

Of course, instead of dietary trends, the company's woes could be the result of people waking up to the knowledge that donuts hate them.

While I'm sure their research & development efforts are in overdrive to come up with low-carb/no-carb kruller, Krispy Kreme better not jump the gun on any announcements. Otherwise, they could end up like donut con artist Robert Ligon.

----------


 
MINTED
Yesterday I bought two Hershey's Cookies 'N' Mint bars. They were on sale at the cafeteria at my workplace. I gave brief thought to buying the whole damn box.

Why? Because I like it. And because, as it says right on the package, it's a "Limited Edition" bar. That means they don't make it too often, which is beyond me--it rocks!

Call me a sucker for marketing tags that are designed to move merchandise. Actually, call me a sucker for mint flavoring; I can't get enough of it. I drink at least one cup of mint tea at work each day, and I've rarely been known to turn down a York Peppermint Pattie. Maybe I'm a mint addict!

Is there such a thing at mint addiction? If there is, I'll bet Mint Snuff is the root cause.

----------


 
GETTING BURNED, ON AND OFF THE ICE
it burns
As if getting beaten by the Flames on home ice in Game 1 weren't bad enough, Tampa Bay defenseman Dan Boyle discovered after the Stanley Cup Finals game that his South Tampa home caught fire that very same night. The fire, caused by electrical malfunction, was contained quickly, but it still caused about $300,000 worth of damage and forces Boyle to find someplace else to sleep.

An electrical fire, during the Lightning-Flames series. A bad omen?

----------


 
A DAY OFF
Nothing like taking a day off in the middle of the week. I needed some down time. I find it serves as good motivation at the workplace, not only when coming back, but also immediately before--I get more energized to wrap some tasks up before packing it in for a day or two.

For today, I'm about to meet a friend for lunch. Then maybe catch some sun, and then some gadget tinkering and writing (including blogging) in the afternoon. Life in fourth gear (or is it first? I don't know how to drive manual...)

----------


Tuesday, May 25, 2004


 
TEEN INFLUENCE, ONLINE
Peer pressure extends to the Internet, which is good news for marketers. Adolescents spend plenty of time online, and a select 17 percent of them are in a position to influence the larger group. More of the nitty-gritty research, from Jupiter Research, is available from eMarketer.

Interesting that, even with complete acclimation through IM, Web and email, television is still the more dominant media in the lives of the younger generation. As much as it's maligned, the effortlessness, immediacy and pervasivness of TV is tough to beat.

----------


 
GAME ONE: STANLEY CUP 2004
shock singe
Here we go... Tampa Bay vs. Calgary. As improbable a matchup as you could imagine. I'm going to enjoy every minute of it.

As far as getting a ticket to a game, as I'd hoped... It's not looking likely. All the games are sold out here, and the scalpers/brokers are asking for a ton. I'm slowly coming around to the view that it's not going to be worth it to shell out $200 for a nosebleed seat, and I'm not going to break the bank for a floor seat. I'll just have to settle for a comfortable seat at home.

And now, if I may borrow a battle cry from Edmonton, that I always thought was hilarious: BURN, FLAMES, BURNNNNNNN!!!

UPDATE: The Flames did some burning, all right--all over the Bolts in a 4-1 butt-kickin'. Just as well that I didn't attend.

Oh well. Only one game. I'm looking forward to a good, long series, with Stanley getting a tan by the end of it.

----------


 
VENUS FLYTRAP DECLINING DEAD
flytrip
A little over a month ago, I bought a Venus flytrap. It took me about that long to kill it.

As I speak, I'm gazing at a pot full of semi-moist soil, with a mass of blackened stalks in the center. If it's not totally expired, it's pretty close.

What happened? Beats me. I might have put it in the wrong type of soil, I might have over-watered it (my usual method of killing off plants). Whatever I did, I did it wrong, because the trap never had a chance.

I can't say I'm too broken up about it. As is typical for me, I lost interest in my botanical experiment almost as quickly as I got fired up about it. It's the basic problem I have with all types of plants: They don't do anything, so they can't sustain my interest for very long. Even this one, with the potential for chomp-em-up action, managed to bore me. Once it started to wither, my apathy set in, and I let things slide.

There was a fitting irony to my failed plant stewardship. Yesterday, I saw a fly buzz across my living room. Serves me right, I suppose.

----------


Monday, May 24, 2004


 
PETER SELLERS: THE MAN WHO WASN'T THERE
mein fuhrer, i can walk
I'm r